"We do not look at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen. For the things which are seen are temporary, but the things which are not seen are eternal." ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Saturday, October 10, 2009
What should we think of Karl Barth?
Many in our day are returning to the theology of Karl Barth. People are tired of Liberalism and do not like Fundamentalism. Barth satisfies the intellectual because he was intelligent. He puts liberalism in its place. But Barth is Neo-orthodox and this is like purgatory - it is supposed to be a place between heaven and hell, but it is a place that doesn't really exist. So Barth's Neo-orthodoxy is supposed to be a theology between Liberalism and Fundamentalism that steers clear of the problems of each side. However, the fact remains, as one scholar has written, "Barth’s theology is not Christianity. It is, just as modernism itself is, another religion. Barth is a wolf bleating." Read the following article about Karl Barth to find out more about the dangers of Barth's theology.
The Trinity Foundation
Karl Barth - by John Robbins
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Bromiley on Barth on Scripture: A Case of Startling Consistency
Contrary to many neo-barthian scholars, such as Dr. Richard Burnett of Erskine Seminary, Dr. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, former professor at Fuller Theological Seminary, understands and exposes Barth's unorthodox view of Holy Scripture. Read this paper and decide for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)